| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns | 
| From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) | 
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:31:14 EST | 
In a message dated 1/15/01 10:02:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, aa4lr@arrl.net 
writes:
> Do you want to do it "right" or "good enough"? Your source is correct 
>  that Rohn tower sections are actually stronger than their published 
>  figures. The design rules are likely to be 200-300% over the rated loads. 
    I don't think that's right. The figures I've seen are 30-50%. The problem 
is that wind pressures do not go up linearly - the pressures go up 
geometrically. You run out of engineering overhead real quick if your tower 
takes a gust higher than your design windspeed. For instance, a wind 71 MPH 
exerts windpressure of 20 PSF; a gust at 87 MPH has a force of 30 PSF - a 50% 
increase for a 16 MPH increase in windspeed. 
    The LXC Prime Directive still applies - DO what the manufacturer says.
Cheers,   Steve   K7LXC
Tower Tech
--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, Bill Coleman | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, K7LXC@aol.com | 
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, Bill Coleman | 
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, K7LXC@aol.com | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |