Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Is the FCC sharp? Is ARRL counsel swift?

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Is the FCC sharp? Is ARRL counsel swift?
From: [email protected] (Bill Coleman)
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 23:16:52 -0500
On 12/28/01 8:22 PM, Pete Smith at [email protected] wrote:

>By the way, doesn't "let em go mobile" rank right up there with "let em eat
>cake"?  What nonsense.  Mobile HF stations will never offer the
>capabilities for international disaster relief that home stations can.  The
>person who wrote that never had to contend with the real world.

Come to think of it, isn't the reason the ARRL has really gone to bat on 
this topic (aside from the nuisance it poses), is because the FCC 
recently granted larger preemption on the part of certain satellite TV 
services?

Couldn't the the same "they can operate elsewhere" or "go mobile" 
arguments be extended to these TV services? Hmmm....



Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: [email protected]
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901



AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available!  Windloading tables,
foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
AN Wireless Web site:  http://www.ANWireless.com

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              [email protected]
Administrative requests:  [email protected]
Problems:                 [email protected]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>