Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L

To: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L
From: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:08:27 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I new to 160M and am always learning but I'd like to reiterate a main point in 
your msg Rich and that is hearing is usually more important than transmitting.  
If you can't hear 'em you can't work 'em.  I'd invest more time and effort on 
improving one's receiving capabilities than on transmitting, all things equal.  
And, I'd agree, one never knows where the signal angle is coming from on 160M 
and that leads me to a point I make to those who inquire.  It never hurts to 
have mulitple options of receiving antennas to choose from.  What works one 
night may be useless the next and the other antenna works better that night.  
If I may take a short bandwidth, I remember listening to one of those African 
DXpeditions early in 2003 and during the course of one evening, they came in 
best on the 4 square and then later better on the beverage, then best on the 
delta loop.  The angle must have been changing all the while.  Even low dipoles 
as well as short beverages or even long wires laid out on the ground may be 
suitable for reception.  Phil  KB9CRY
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>