Blake Bowers wrote:
>
> Unless, of course you are near an airport, or glideslope.
k4sb wrote:
> > I seriously doubt any liability would exist for your "100 foot Rohn".
> > And if higher, but still below the level of the surrounding trees (
> > you guys on the wrong coast have some BIG trees ) you don't even need
> > FAA approval.
Nope, strange as it may be, you may erect any tower to any height
directly below the glide slope as long as the surrounding trees are
taller.
Which makes some sense....If you are about to hit the trees ( say a CA
Redwood ), I would think the last problem on your mind would be
hitting a tower.
):>
Ed
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|