Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR

["Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>]

Well, I must say, I have had some questions about the steppIR fluid motion 
antennas since I came back from Dayton.

It seems that one of the overriding draws to the Fluid Motion brand antennas 
is that you can adjust the element lengths so that on any frequency above 
the low limit, you can achieve zero reflected power.    There are two things 
about this that bother me, but I do not know if they matter or not since I 
have never owned one of these antennas.

It's safe to assume that the feedline in a typical installation is at least 
60 or 70 feet long, probably longer in most cases.   This is usually a 
significant length in terms of wavelength above 30 m.   I also assume that 
reflected power, or vswr, is being measured in the shack.   One thing that 
bothers me about this is that this doesn't guarantee that the Z at the 
feedpoint is actually 50 j0.   It's probably close enough on the lower bands 
but on 10 or 12 meters, where the feed is likely to be mulitple lambda in 
length, I wonder if using the antenna as a tuner gets the user into 
something like the "my feedline tunes my antenna!" type of situation i.e. 
the meter in the shack may show true unity along the line, or maybe you just 
happen to have adjusted the antenna so that the length of feedline you are 
using and your frequency result in a nice looking match at the shack but the 
feedpoint, if you could measure there, would tell a different story?

The other question i have is, how do you know the element length that gives 
you a match to 50 ohm feedline, is the antenna dimension that gives you 
optimum gain and F/B?  Is the element length for 50 ohm Z always the length 
for best performance?

I essentially question giving no reflected power the highest priority which 
seems to be what happens with these antennas.  Or maybe most of the time you 
get close enough to having your cake and eating it too so that my concerns 
are minor issues?


73,

rob / k5uj


ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:00:18 -0400, "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
wrote:

> It isn't how an antenna really works that matters. The only thing that 
> really matters is how we feel about it.
>
> I've worked VK several times from my mobile on 160, and even Europe on SSB 
> 160. I've worked VK3IM while he was mobile a dozen times or more on 160. In 
> all cases antenna efficiency was less than 1% and power less than 400W, 
> only 100W for the VK3 who used to work me.
>
> :-)

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Spot on, as they say.

SteppIR is becoming a religion, much like Collins.

Bill W6WRT

_________________________________________________________________
Picture this ? share your photos and you could win big!  
http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us

_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i?m Initiative now. 
It?s free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_June07

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk