Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower design question

To: <DMartin560@aol.com>, <kc5qbc@swbell.net>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower design question
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:50:09 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Just ask K1AR about that some time! He had to get Rohn to build him a 
shortie "reversal section" .

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <DMartin560@aol.com>
To: <kc5qbc@swbell.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower design question


>
> Rohn products aren't designed that way.
> As you stack the sections the upper one goes over the lower one.
> If you aren't doing it that way you are installing them upside down.
> Just wait till the project calls for a top section or flat plate.  You get 
> to
> the top and it won't fit.
>
> KG4ADM,  Dwayne
>
>
>
> Something has been bothering me for a while. With all the discussion and
> problems with tower leg corrosion, filling with water and splitting, etc. 
> Why do
> almost ALL the manufacturers design the joints to telescope inside from 
> above
> which leaves water able to run inside joints and fill tubes? Why not 
> simply
> invert the connection by telescoping over the bottom section so water just 
> runs
> outside not through the joint. I know there is no difference in joint 
> strength
> or assembly difficulty, so why?
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at 
> http://www.aol.com.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>