| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA |
| From: | Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:22:27 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I'm a firm believer modeling. I use EZNEC and AutoEZ and trust them. Wes On 1/21/2019 3:18 AM, Edward Sawyer wrote: "Isn't that pretty much what I inferred?? You put it up as high as your location and checkbook can stand and wait for the propagation gods to smile on you."Wes? N7WSActually Wes, this is 100% wrong if you have complex terrain. I have that here and I modeled 10, 15, 20, 40 using HFTA. On 40M a higher antenna would be even more potent. But on 10. 15. 20. My lower antennas to EU - where I have significant terrain enhancement, modeled to be the better antennas. And after a decade of on the air observation, HFTA is spot on.73Ed N1UR_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, john@kk9a.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, Edward Sawyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |