Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Can 1/4" or 3/8" Andrew SUPERFLEX be used for a Rotor lo

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Can 1/4" or 3/8" Andrew SUPERFLEX be used for a Rotor loop?
From: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:08:59 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 07/17/20 8:50 AM, jimlux wrote:
Did anyone look at the M&P ( Italy) site ?

I've been involved for 20+ years with several divisions of what was CDT ( Mohawk, Montrose, West Penn Wire  etc) now merged into Belden Corp. Observed many braiding & bunching machines in operation.  I always understood that many of the best fabricating machines in the wire industry were made in Italy.  I drew a conclusion that coax form ITALY very well could be the best. That said , I watched several coax connector assembly videos provided BY M&P , and was surprised to see they suggest you do NOT solder the shield on either N type for PL-259. They must believe that the compression is adequate.  Why do I think that could be a warming while running that EXPERT KW ??????

I think there's ample info out there that says that compression connections (if properly made) are far superior to soldered connections. The challenge is the "properly made" - I've not done big 1/2" coax, just RG-58, microwave semi-rigid and regular old stranded wire. For all of those, if you have the right tool, it's easy to make a good compression connection that is gas tight, stands up to temperature cycling and vibration, etc. I would imagine that the bigger connectors and cables are the same.

However, it requires tooling specifically for your application, it isn't necessarily cheap, and so forth.  If you're doing a few connectorsa month or year, as a hobby, it's hard to justify several hundred bucks for a set of tools to cover all connectors and cable sizes.  I think that's where soldering has its place (or ordering premade cables!)

When I was making dozens of cables in a day - it was easily worth the money, especially for the RG58 BNCs for Thin Ethernet. Spin the stripper around the cable, load the ferrule and connector, crimp, done. If it took 30 seconds it was probably because I was distracted.  Same if you're doing F connectors on RG-6 or RG-59.  There's no way I could have soldered on a connector that fast, especially if I had to wait for the iron to heat. And, in any case, that horrible polyethylene dielectric would have melted.
_______________________________________________

One needs to differentiate between crimp connectors and compression connectors.

The true compression connectors are considered the most reliable. They are available for most common cable types, but not all connector types.

They are widely used on
1) CATV RG59, RG6, RG11 (F connectors)
2) Braided, solid center conductor cable (LMR-195-240-400) (N, 7-16 DIN)
3) Heliax style cable, all sizes, both regular & superflex style (N, 7-16 DIN, 4.3-10 DIN)

Compression connectors have excellent strain relief & weatherproofing properties.

Crimp connectors work very well, but with those I pay particular attention to strain relief by using at least two layers of heatshrink with staggered lengths.

-Steve K8LX




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>