I've read the referenced K5IU paper several times and always come back
to this issue: How much does it matter that the currents are unbalanced?
Modeling in 4.2 of my measured 8x .25wl long 10ft elevated radial
currents, which have 3:1 variation (average soil), shows a small
fraction of a db shift of same gain and elevation pattern as
symmetrical. So if 4.2 is to be believed (some say not), it isn't worth
"fixing" my imbalance. I haven't noticed a performance asymmetry.
For resonant elevated radials, modeling with 1, then 2, etc shows the
pattern is little affected beyond 2. Even for an extreme case of 4 all
in "half the pie". For that case, the result is 2.35db F/B and +1db
gain in the radial direction over 8 symmetrical. Not great but maybe
useful. DXpeditions have used a single radial as an opportunity to
create a favored direction in the pattern.
A little modeling of my T with towers in the model shows that they have
a larger effect than unbalanced currents on the pattern symmetry. I
suspect this is the case for most QTHs with towers, buildings, power
lines, etc in the near field.
It's possible my analysis is missing something, if so, I'm sure I'll be
advised there is contrary data. I think there is no correlation between
these results and what happens in buried radial systems. Also, my T is
75' of vertical and 2x 33ft top hats and fed near its resonance Z with a
TLT. Designs with skewed feedpoints for direct 50 ohm feed or very
short radials may yield very different modeling results. As N6LF showed
in his studies, my 8 radials should be shorter than 1/4wl for a slight
increase in gain. Or conversely, elevated radial resonance doesn't
matter much as the number increases beyond 4.
My measured radial currents sum to the vertical. The MFJ RF current
meter I used must be calibrated on the bench, on all ranges at the test
power level and expected currents.
Also, it is important in these discussions and measurements to separate
antenna efficiency which is highly dependent on the radial system from
far field gain/pattern which depends on the soil/salt water properties.
Grant KZ1W
On 1/21/2022 15:52, Dave Sublette wrote:
I have followed this thread with interest. I am surprised that nobody
seems to have considered the following:
Several months ago I was given a link to a couple of papers by K5IU and
someone else, who I forget, about RF currents in radial systems.
This information is available in the "Lowband DXing" manual.
Briefly, with full sized quarter wave radials, measured RF currents were
found to be unequal in each radial. I have had a full quarter wave 160
meter vertical made with Rohn 45 and a broadcast insulator section 27 feet
above ground operating for more than 30 years. I had 8, full quarter wave
radials suspended 27 feet above ground, sloping to 10 feet at the ends.
The whole antenna footprint is over an acre.
So, having read the paper, I climbed to 27 feet and measured the RF current
in each radial. Much to my surprise, only two of the radials carried the
bulk of the current. The rest hardly had any at all.
The article recommended using one eighth long radials and tuning the
reactance out with a coil in series with the shield of the feedline and the
connection of the radials. So, I took down my full sized radials and
replaced them with four, one eighth wavelength radials and a matching
coil. Modeling shows capacitive reactance of 160 ohms for these shortened
radials, 14 uh at 160 meters. That's what I wound and it works perfectly.
The RF currents in each of the radials is now equal and the sum of the four
currents is equal to the current flowing in the driven element. I don't see
any improvement or degradation since changing the radials.
Here is the bottom line to me. I have this vision of everyone going to all
the expense and labor (considerable labor!) to either bury or suspend
quarter wave radials and the result would seem to be less than optimum.
The efficiency and pattern should be affected by unequal currents flowing
in the radials.
In light of this info and my experience, this discussion has missed the
mark.
I might add that in neither case , short or long radials, the angle of
slope of each radial with respect to the others was not equal. Nor did I
go to any trouble to try and tune them to exactly the same frequency.
These differences might contribute to the unequal currents, but didn't seem
to affect the shortened radials at all.
Offered in a spirit of curiosity and hoping to learn.
73,
Dave., K4TO
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|