>
>The paragraph below shows why you color the data you get, and
>misrepresent it. You have an agenda, to prove everyone who is
>successful is a crook.
>
>> Ä Manufacturers discredit themselves. For example, Bridgestone /
>> Firestone apparently knew about the tread separation problem in 1992, yet
>> they did not fix it. About the same time, I was driving my Dodge maxivan
>> on the freeway when a sudden tread separation occurred in a Bridgestone
>> tire. So how did this happen?. In a word, the answer could be
>> *ringeshow* (pronounced rin-gay-show). Ringeshow is a Japanese word which
>> means that needed changes can Only come from the Number One (dai ichi)
>> manager. Any other person in management who suggests that a change is
>> needed will almost certainly be booted out of the company because he
>> violated ringeshow by dissing the #1 dude. Apparently, Ford also knew
>> about the tread separation problem eight or so years ago, and they did
>> nothing. . . Ringeshow.
>>
>> At this moment, two 8877s which suddenly failed in an AL-1500 are being
>> shipped to me. My guess is that gold-sputtering is present in both.
>> Eimac said that gold-sputtering results from oscillation. If the tests
>> proves me wrong, all of you will hear it here.
>
>You don't need to "inspect" the tubes, you already know what your
>conclusion will be.
>
? I never know about gold-sputtering until I reverse the polarity of the
anode potential on the high-pot. .
>When Eimac disagreed with you,
? Eimac engineering didn't disagree. Reid (Mr. XXX) Brandon of the
Marketing Dept. did. Reid told Paul Pagel that W. Foote was *not
authorized* to tell me about gold-sputtering. Whasup with that?
>you blamed them for covering up
>the truth.
Reid undoubtedly said it.
>
>The only thing that prevents you from being widely accepted by
>engineers, is they understand your theories and analysis are all
>bologna. You can dupe the poor Ham who doesn't quite follow all
>the theory,
The theory is hardly esoteric. One Ham who has not followed the theory
is Tom Rauch.
> but you can't fool the people who understand physics or
>circuit theory...especially those with test equipment.
>
? So when are you going to take a college course in Physics of
Electricity?
>
later, Tom
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|