Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Stupid questions...

To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Stupid questions...
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:50:00 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:42:01 -0600, chris@yipyap.com wrote:

>As a neophyte, 

>Chris
>w0ep

You've got an Extra Ticket. It's fair to assume that you studied radio 
and electronics to get it. That's far from being a neophyte. 

>I find it particularly distressing when someone
>says something to the effect of "everybody knows that the '67 ARRL
>handbook was wrong about..."  If such is the case than exhortations
>to read the handbook really don't have much traction.  Mixed messages
>are always a bummer.

That's absurd logic. There are a few mistakes in a textbook, thus why 
bother studying it?  There are numerous inconsistencies in the Bible, 
yet I see few suggestions that we not study it. 

The real experts who choose to contribute their time and energy to 
responding to questions here are, for the most part, gainfully employed 
and quite busy. They don't have time to teach basic electronics, nor 
should they. Be thankful that they do spend this time to pass along 
information and concepts that aren't in the books. And spend your own 
energy in the woodshed before asking a question. When you do, it will 
be a lot better question, and you'll be far better equipped to 
understand the reply (and to know a good answer from a bad one).  

73,

Jim Brown K9YC


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>