CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CW UBN

Subject: [CQ-Contest] CW UBN
From: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sun Jun 2 01:18:56 2002
Except that does zilch one way or another for the score. Pts/Q is just
an analysis tool. In something like the WPX may indicate someone spent
too much time with beams aimed at USA gathering 1 pointers, instead of
a slower (but higher scoring) progress working European stations.

But it has no official status in any contest that I know of. Anyone
who would suggest such a strategy (deleting zero pointers) clearly
does not understand contest scoring rules.


73, Guy.


----- Original Message -----
From: "ww3s" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
To: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW UBN


>
> > There is no loss to logging 0 point qso's. I'm really quite
mystified
> > that anyone would drop them who is using any of the computer
loggers.
>
> I'm told its because it lowers the average points per q or something
like
> that....
>
> 73
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>