QUACK's
Good thinking today with computer logging , however when we were papering
logging I'm sure that many guys didn't put in a W7 into their log when they
already had a W6 zone 3 and a couple of VE7's, TOO much effort to write
them down and also dupe.
Rex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@contesting.com>
To: "ww3s" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 04:18
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW UBN
> Except that does zilch one way or another for the score. Pts/Q is just
> an analysis tool. In something like the WPX may indicate someone spent
> too much time with beams aimed at USA gathering 1 pointers, instead of
> a slower (but higher scoring) progress working European stations.
>
> But it has no official status in any contest that I know of. Anyone
> who would suggest such a strategy (deleting zero pointers) clearly
> does not understand contest scoring rules.
>
>
> 73, Guy.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ww3s" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
> To: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW UBN
>
>
> >
> > > There is no loss to logging 0 point qso's. I'm really quite
> mystified
> > > that anyone would drop them who is using any of the computer
> loggers.
> >
> > I'm told its because it lowers the average points per q or something
> like
> > that....
> >
> > 73
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
|