Greetings Dick and the group,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Green [mailto:dick.green@VALLEY.NET]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:50 AM
> To: 'Darryl Wagoner'; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it???
>
> In my opinion, the next best choice is for the QSL manager to
> apply for a cert for the DX station. This would be
> appropriate when the DX station has no access to the
> Internet, cannot or does not want to upload logs to LoTW, or
> supplies paper logs to a QSL manager who types them into a
> logging program. In this case, the QSL manager would apply
> for the cert. The DX station still has to supply the required
> license and ID information, so security is maintained. I
> don't know whether ARRL will mail the password to the DX
> station or to the QSL manager in such cases. I believe there
> will be documentation on the web about this shortly.
This is a interesting idea. Is there any policy reason why
the call sign owner and a TrustedQSL manager couldn't each
have a cert for the same call sign? This would allow the
QSL manager to do his/her job, but also have accountability of
who is issuing the tQSLs.
Also Dick you should be very proud of this system. It is really
great!
73
Darryl WA1GON
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|