CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it???

To: "R Johnson" <k1vu@tmlp.com>,"Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it???
From: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Reply-to: jmaass@columbus.rr.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:39:47 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bob:

Well, Bob, you're free to consider it any way you want. 

That said, you're wrong.

You said it yourself: it's a *public* list, open to all
to express their views.

73,

  Jeff Maass  K8ND

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of R Johnson
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:52 PM
> To: Darryl Wagoner; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it???
> 
> I personally consider it poor form for the ARRL, their employees 
> or advisors
> to use a Public List in this manner.
> 
> Other member associated with the development LoTW have refrained 
> from using
> Non-ARRL list to respond to LoTW questions !!!
> 
> 73
> Bob, K1VU
> 
> At 12:51 9/29/2003 , Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> >Greetings Dick and the group,
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dick Green [mailto:dick.green@VALLEY.NET] 
> > > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:50 AM
> > > To: 'Darryl Wagoner'; cq-contest@contesting.com
> > > Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it???
> > > 
> > > In my opinion, the next best choice is for the QSL manager to 
> > > apply for a cert for the DX station. This would be 
> > > appropriate when the DX station has no access to the 
> > > Internet, cannot or does not want to upload logs to LoTW, or 
> > > supplies paper logs to a QSL manager who types them into a 
> > > logging program. In this case, the QSL manager would apply 
> > > for the cert. The DX station still has to supply the required 
> > > license and ID information, so security is maintained. I 
> > > don't know whether ARRL will mail the password to the DX 
> > > station or to the QSL manager in such cases. I believe there 
> > > will be documentation on the web about this shortly.
> >
> >This is a interesting idea.  Is there any policy reason why
> >the call sign owner and a TrustedQSL manager couldn't each
> >have a cert for the same call sign?  This would allow the
> >QSL manager to do his/her job, but also have accountability of
> >who is issuing the tQSLs.
> >
> >Also Dick you should be very proud of this system.  It is really
> >great!
> >
> >73
> >Darryl WA1GON
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> >THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> >        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CQ-Contest mailing list
> >CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>