RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is

To:	<CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject:	RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is
From:	"Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date:	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:51:08 -0600
List-post:	<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I agree that MOST of SS is great.  HOWEVER, they could lop off those last
three hours and it would not bother me a bit.

Chuck W5PR 



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[CQ-Contest] SS format, (continued) [CQ-Contest] SS format, W2RU - Bud Hippisley Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Bill Coleman Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, asciibaron Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, K0HB Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Richard Zalewski [CQ-Contest] Detroit Area Swap, k8khz Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, N7MAL [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Bill Turner Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Rick Stoneking RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Dale Martin RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Chuck Dietz <= Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, N7MAL Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, N7MAL Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, David Thompson Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Bill Turner Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, kd4d [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, ak0a Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Bill Coleman Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Kelly Taylor RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Mike Fatchett, W0MU Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Bill Turner

Previous by Date:	Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, N7MAL
Next by Date:	RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, K0HB
Previous by Thread:	RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, Dale Martin
Next by Thread:	Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is, N7MAL
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]