CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:34:15 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:15:34 -0600 (CST), Zack Widup wrote:

>I've watched QST decline in technical quality over the last few years. 

_________________________________________________________

Really?  I feel the QUALITY is better than ever.  What has changed is
the QUANTITY.  Go back to the '50s and '60s and QST was full of
homebrew stuff because that's what hams did back then.  And not just a
one hour project either.  Major stuff.

Nowadays hams are more likely to go to QST to get HRO's phone number,
if they don't already have it on their auto dialer.  

Sigh.

--
Bill W6WRT,
who once built a 40 meter mobile SSB rig of his own
design from scratch.  It worked fine and I was quite proud
of it, but I wouldn't do it again.



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 11/30/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>