CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718

To: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718
From: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:46:27 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Bob,

Well neither does dual receive, which is a bonus in the FT1000 series.  I
would seriously doubt that either comes close to the FT1000 in performance,
although I have heard nice things about the FT920, especially if you do some
of the INRAD mods, and put the dual filter board in it.  There is a reason
why some rigs cost more than others, and the Icom 718 is an economical rig,
which probably makes it fine for casual operating, but I suspect that the
front end would collapse in a contest.

If you want a good economical contest rig, get a Kenwood TS850, TS940 or an
Icom 761 or 765.

73s John NE0P
----- Original Message -----
From: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:49 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718


> Has anyone used the FT-920 or IC-718 for contesting? I just heard they are
> as good as the FT-1000 series rigs for contesting and am curious as to
just
> how true this is.
>
> They certainly aren't as pricey if it is true.
>
> TNX,
> Bob
> KE5CTY (old calls WB5ZQU - WY5L)
> http://www.qsl.net/ke5cty/
> Code may be dying but the pioneering spirit that put the code there in
> the first place is still going strong.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>