CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.

To: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:09:50 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
At 07:24 PM 7/24/2005, Ron Notarius wrote:
>Now... would it be nice to be able to upload an ADIF file without signing
>it?  Sure.  Could you make the argument that they've taken security about
>one level further than might be neccesary?  Sure.  Such is life.

"Such is life". Sigh. With that attitude, we'd still be using spark.


>And I just
>think of the alternative, another system out there that has given me
>"credit" for North Korea -- a "QSO" on the 1 mm band with P5SLIM.  A hoax
>perpetuated about 5 years ago, yet it's still out there, unpurged by the
>system.  Could this be perpetuated on LotW?  Maybe.  But I'd bet it'd be a
>LOT harder!)

LoTW only gives credit when two stations submit the same info. Did you 
submit the above QSO? Of course not, so what is your complaint?

Bill, W6WRT



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>