CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest ?
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:27:34 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Wally,

You are no normal person, you are a contester ;-))

Perhaps you will find it a fairer competition to work only DX outside the
continent as I do?
Or is it fair that OX has fewer hams and a poorer location then LZ to be
competitive?

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Valeri Stefanov

In IARU 2005 -
It is NOT normal DA0HQ to have over 9000 DL QSOs out of total of 19 000.
It is NOT normal to have SN0HQ been called by 1200 different SP callsigns
who used JUST ONE STATION to make these QSOs. 528 of these 1200
SP operators worked SN0HQ on all 6 bands form JUST ONE STATION.
SN0HQ had 8 000 QSO's with SP stations ,too !
(info is translated from the link in Russain given above )

As a normal person I would  NOT call this a fair competition 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>