No, Glenn, that is not assisted. You weren't serious, were you?
73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
To: "Barry" <w2up@mindspring.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>; "Richard L.
King" <k5na@ecpi.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores
> I wonder if I lived in an apartment, and had no antennas, ham gear,
> nothing at all related to this hobby , then I went to visit my
> friend John VE3EJ. He has a mega station , with multiple
> yagis on all the bands, multiple rigs , amps etc etc etc ...
>
> Gosh , all that hard work HE did to get the station together...
>
> And all I did was sit in the chair for 48 hours...
>
> And I have not been assisted ???
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores
>
>
>
>> At 11:39 12/21/2006, Barry wrote:
>>>The definition of Assisted only refers to using a spotting network.
>>>However, I see no difference between SOA and SO/guest op or an SO with a
>>>"pit crew." True single op is single op. Single op with helpers to
>>>prepare meals, fix equipment problems, etc., is not single op, IMO.
>>>73,
>>>Barry
>
>
>
>>>Barry Kutner, W2UP
>>>Newtown, PA
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|