| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules |
| From: | steve.root@culligan4water.com |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:36:17 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Why do all "technological innovations", "enhancements", "technical progess", and "new technologies" have to be so hideously expensive? Somewhere along the line we have to admit that it's going to be tough to bring new blood into a hobby that has such a high price of admission. Some things are bad ideas for other reasons beside interpretations of existing contest rules. 73 Steve K0SR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules, Ron Notarius W3WN |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet debate, Doug Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules, Ron Notarius W3WN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules, dave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |