[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers

To: "'Bill Tippett'" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>,<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers
From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Reply-to: vo1he@rac.ca
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:53:58 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Tippett
> Sent: July 8, 2007 21:24
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers
> VO1HE:
>  >No real easy solution to this.
>          I disagree.  The easy solution is to work serious 
> competitors who long ago learned to log every QSO.  If you 
> work Joe Blow who is looking for new band countries, chances 
> are that he may not log you.  Until my first UBN experience, 
> I was one of those who did not log every USA guy who called.  
> After I got my first UBN report and realized I was 
> unknowingly penalizing some who I had not logged, I then 
> started logging every call.

So now, along with Super Check Partial, I need a database that tells me who
logs everyone and who doesn't? Can I get one that tells me who's on LoTW and
who's not and who QSLs and who doesn't too?

For the record... I log everyone. Don't care about 0 pointers.

73 -- Paul VO1HE

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>