Hi Pete,
You really touched EU nerve :-) You popularity seems to be very high with
CW Skimmer. I might save you soon with CW Expert robot.
Your propossal about 4 hours EU RTTY type test in CW mode is interesting but
too short for DX run.
K3BU is trying for a long time to promote Tesla contest fairly based on
distance calculations.
http://www.teslaradio.org/rules.htm is structered along WRTC rules but
colides with CQ WW RTTY.
K1AR wrote: Over the years, no one has hated QTCs more than me.
Somehow I thought that John hates me by sending QTCs over 40 wpm. I am
still not sure about K1DG who does the same.
73 de Mario, S56A
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?"
>I wish this was true, Mario, but I don't regard it as a favor, and your
>"small group" is very large indeed, from my experience. Please, let me
>have my fast runs and don't insist on QTCs until there are no stations
>calling for a QSO. As for the favor, that only applies if I'm out to win
>the contest, and not even then, if I'm running on Saturday.
>
> All I'm asking for is a little mutual understanding.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at
> www.conteststations.com
> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
> reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
> spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
>
>
> On 8/15/2010 1:36 PM, S56A wrote:
>> Pete, can you imagine how much fun EU contesters have fast typing up to
>> 2K QTC for 36/48 hours? Small group of most dedicated ones would ask you
>> for QTC. It is a favour for you as 10 QTC points are much easier than 10
>> QSO.at any rate.
>>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|