CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED

To: "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:53:52 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bob,

You have captured exactly the crux of the issue.  Haven't seen are more 
clear description of the reason that skimmer-like technology constitutes 
assistance in the classic radiosport sense of the term.

73, de Hans, K0HH

> You have to have both locating AND identifying components performed by the
> operator.
>
> Of course, with digital modes, a decoder (a machine of some sort) is
> required as very few operators can decode RTTY or PSK (as just two
> examples) just with their ears.
>
> I think that for digital signals, if you are single op - without
> assistance, that the decoder should be single-channel (decoding just one
> signal at a time) and require that the operator select (tune in) a signal
> to begin the decoding process.
>
> IMO, a device like skimmer for CW (or something similar that does Digital
> modes), that simultaneously decodes all signals within a passband is
> clearly different and its use should be considered assisted operating for
> those modes as well. 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>