CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Two Reasons Why Assisted and Unassisted Should Be Merge

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two Reasons Why Assisted and Unassisted Should Be Merged
From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:31:43 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I prefer another VE3NEA creation - Morserunner.

Faster pileups, better ops, and everyone signs their calls :-)

Barry W2UP

On 12/1/2011 3:06 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
> Jim, K6OK wrote great CW Skimmer RBN motto: You can't beat free worldwide
> advertising!
>
>
>
> However, N5TJ proved that "assisted" helps!  It took us 20 years to accept
> DX Cluster.  I hope only 10 years for CW Skimmer.
>
>
>
> I admire USA "Can do" attitude!  We were blessed with excellent propagations
> in all 3 CQ WW events but the amount of minor complaints here amazes me.
> Surge of CW activity can be contributed to CW Skimmer decoding but we mainly
> watch error rates.  Single SDR box and VE3NEA software are decoding complete
> 6 contest bands live and we are not happy.  Go play computer chess and try
> to win.
>
>
>
> LP MMM S56A
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

-- 

Barry Kutner, W2UP             Lakewood, CO

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>