CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:31:19 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 1/30/2014 4:39 PM, Yuriy Rakushchynets wrote:
Each operator us own style running CQ, and is bad idea to force to mandatory
ID after 3 qso. Whats will be next? no more than 2 QSO when you S&P
No more 200qso per hour? Common folks, don't want to wait for Mult, just
go away.


I'm mixed on this issue. Not iding is not the best form, but the fact of the matter is that (especially on SSB), 3 QSOs can be made in 25 seconds. Are folks that impatient that they cannot wait 30 seconds - especially when the pileup is large enough with stations that do know the call of the frequency runner?

73 Rich NN3W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>