CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: "'Richard F DiDonna NN3W'" <richnn3w@verizon.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:34:39 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Are folks that impatient that they cannot wait 30 seconds

Huh? Isn´t that impatience the name of the game contesting???
Running stations fight for the last millisecond substituting even "TU" wit
"dit-dit" - but S&P-ops should be meant to have idle time... Let alone that
the S&P-station may be an unassisted SO2R-op.

Enforcing does not seem to be too difficult. It will hit stations IDing so
rarely that they will cause complaints which can be checked with
SDR-recordings.

73, Chris DL8MBS


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>