CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:57:19 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
But to us, that is like us having a Stateside Buro.
I really wonder why one hasn't started for stateside stuff.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/3/2017 8:01 PM, Ria Jairam wrote:
For Europeans the picture is very different. A lot of them use bureau
QSLing as their primary means of card sending and receiving.

- Ria, N2RJ

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:00 PM W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:

If I need a card, the buro was never the answer.  If they are for band

fills, etc sure and I just hope to get something back.  I bet my buro

return rate is less than 10 percent.





On 1/3/2017 10:44 AM, DXer wrote:

Just a guess...to let the sending bureau and/or ham know that they tried,
but were unable to deliver the cards, and make 'adjustments'. Something
like the post office returning undelivered mail, instead of round filling
them. I would not want QSL cards to be treated as 'junk mail'.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
======================================
Why would anyone return unwanted cards?  It sure would have helped the
environmental impact by putting them in the recycling bin........Right?
W0MU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>