CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Encouraging Casual Participation in Contests

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Encouraging Casual Participation in Contests
From: Martin LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Reply-to: lu5dx@lucg.com.ar
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:42:36 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Absolutely great idea.

TBH, LoTW should become the standard solution for issuing credits for other awards. National and local Clubs, Groups, could take advantage of it.

We've been talking about this type of solution with LU1FAM and LU5FF.

The ARRL could charge a small fee to those institutions using their LoTW service to validate the credits.

Win-Win solution!

73,

Martin LU5DX


El 26/04/2017 a las 11:23 a.m., Pete Smith N4ZR escribió:
We all agree, I think, that casual participants are a critical part of the total workable population in contests. I spent the first 40 years of my contesting career working contests as a quick and relatively easy source of award credits, and I suspect a large majority of the stations in any contest are doing some variation on this.

There is a reasonably simple and straight-forward way to encourage more of this, potentially yielding more people for us to work. We need interconnection between CQ and ARRL contest databases, so that any contact that is in both stations' log in a given contest can be claimed for ARRL and CQ award credit without going through the QSL card process.

I'm not underestimating the programming effort involved, I hope, but surely some combination of volunteer and professional staff involvement can get it done. It could start small - perhaps a pilot involving the CQWW open log database and DXCC. Imagine the value added to LOTW if it were the hub for this process, and the potential increase in DXCC fees. Surely, this is a win-win proposition.



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>