To: | "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>,"Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>, <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams |
From: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:36:18 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
At 05:18 PM 7/19/2004, Hare,Ed, W1RFI wrote:> We need to reign in the well-intentioned people in our > fraternity who are actually doing us harm, which includes > those who have data that could be good but who present it in > a way that makes us look technically uneducated. (As an > example using S meter readings .) Moreover, for the non-ham audience, many of whom have had experience with signal strength meters on FM receivers or VU meters on tape recorders, the meter deflection at least offers a relative indication of the intensity of the interference, even if the precision is limited to "nothing much" to "wow." 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database was updated on June 5, 2004 2728 contest stations at www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] replies, Dan Richardson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL), Dave Bernstein |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams, Hare,Ed, W1RFI |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams, Tom Rauch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |