RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams
From: Mike Coslo <mcoslo@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:38:44 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Dave Bernstein wrote:

I disagree, Ed. Senior management can create a single integrated team tasked
with winning this war. Educating the ham community, and providing them with
continuously up-to-date information would be a critical responsibility for
this team. Once they are up to speed, there will be few questions or issues
they can't efficiently handle. I unfamiliar with the ARRL's internal
organization, but my experience is that the classic functional model that
serves organizations well when they're in equilibrium often gets in the way
during times of rapid change. Whoever is driving ARRL's anti-BPL effort
should be empowered to set the strategy and execute every dimension of it.
Your "not my bailiwick" comment implied that you lacked this authority,
which is what triggered my suggestion.



Hi Dave,

Why don't you call ARRL, and make your sugestion. Better yet, when you call them, volunteer to do this thing. If you don't want to do it through the ARRL, then set yourself up as a clearinghouse.

Would you volunteer to head up such an effort?


- Mike KB3EIA -



_______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>