1. I will not participate in, much less establish, an anti-BPL effort
outside of the ARRL; that would be counterproductive.
2. I have already volunteered to help the ARRL effort.
3. I would rather convince Ed first and then if asked help him approach
senior management; reversing the order breaks a lot of glass.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Mike Coslo
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 18:39
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams
Dave Bernstein wrote:
>I disagree, Ed. Senior management can create a single integrated team
>tasked with winning this war. Educating the ham community, and
>providing them with continuously up-to-date information would be a
>critical responsibility for this team. Once they are up to speed, there
>will be few questions or issues they can't efficiently handle. I
>unfamiliar with the ARRL's internal organization, but my experience is
>that the classic functional model that serves organizations well when
>they're in equilibrium often gets in the way during times of rapid
>change. Whoever is driving ARRL's anti-BPL effort should be empowered
>to set the strategy and execute every dimension of it. Your "not my
>bailiwick" comment implied that you lacked this authority, which is
>what triggered my suggestion.
>
>
>
Hi Dave,
Why don't you call ARRL, and make your sugestion. Better yet, when
you call them, volunteer to do this thing. If you don't want to do it
through the ARRL, then set yourself up as a clearinghouse.
Would you volunteer to head up such an effort?
- Mike KB3EIA -
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|