I can't answer his specific question, because it is posed incorrectly. That
is, one, there is no digging. So we cannot
compute the effort involved. Two, since most hams can obtain huge amounts
of old scrap wire at hamfests, estate sales, old farms, and the like, there
is trivial cost. With trivial cost, and little labor, I cannot compute a
tradeoff in terms of dollars or sweat per db. The thing to to is pay
attention to the details here.... little cost, little labor, means that the
real issue is the space available and how much you want the 3 db of gain
originally posted.
AA2IZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Radials
> OK guys, to be honest, I believe I now understand less than I did when we
> started this thread!
>
> It seems we have good arguments on both sides of he story, but for most of
> us, going to so much trouble is probably out of the question.
>
> I found it useful how N6KB summed it up (repeated below).
> Perhaps someone could answer his specific question.
>
> >And that, along with the cost of the wire, is why people want to
> >now is 30 quarter wavelenth radials better than 60 eighth wavelength
> >nes (or some other comparison of equal materials and digging)"
>
> DE N6KB
>
> 73
> Rick
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|