| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Radials |
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:30:37 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
DJ0IP wrote:
>And once again, the question of 30x 1/4 vs 60x 1/8 wavelength radials
remains unanswered. (for 160 meters I believe...de W4ZV)
And the answer is:
30 * 0.25 * 538' = ~4000' of wire
Looking at Figure 3 on page 3 here:
http://www.ncjweb.com/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf
the optimum number of radials for ~4000' of
total wire is 30-40 assuming average soil.
Therefore the answer to your question is:
30 1/4 radials has about 0.2 dB less loss than
60 1/8 radials. Will you ever notice the
difference? I doubt it.
There is also a simple guideline in ON4UN's
book which says there is no need for any space
between radials to be closer than ~0.015 wavelengths.
This is all covered in great detail in Chapter 9
of the most recent Low Band DX-ing.
73, Bill W4ZV
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] MacLogger and N4PY, Richard Hemingway |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Question for Contesters:, Bill Rowlett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Radials, Tony Martin W4FOA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Radials, David Kelley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |