TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
From: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:29:57 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bob,

I too agree it's time to kill this one. 

I have learned a lot. And I promise I'll get a 1:1 balun and a short hunk of 
coax for the connections to the 260 foot doublet I plan on putting up.

Like I said, I have a major antenna project going on.

50 foot tilt over universal aluminum tower (Big hole with 6 cubic yards of 
concrete)

DX engineering hex beam

double bazooka for 40
another one for 30

a alpha delta plain jane 20 meter dipole

six meter dipole

and the 260 foot doublet.

And the OCF dipole will remain, untouched, in the only tree in the yard.


If it doesn't rain today, I'll use the winch on the jeep to lift the tower into 
place.

In the mean time, is that 'dot' on the Ten Tec logo orange or red?

Mike, Wb8vge
Mike Bryce
prosolar@sssnet.com



On Jul 13, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:

> Mike et al;
> 
> Frankly, I think we've whipped the general OCF topic to death.   Personally I 
> have thoroughly enjoyed the discussions and I've leaned a lot, mostly for my 
> future antenna location.  The results and info provided from others has 
> proven to illuminate a wealth of information.
> 
> While, as Rick said, I don't personally nor presently favor OCF antennas, it 
> may become one of my "needs" an thus discussions such as these are very 
> fruitful.
> 
> Secondly, the balun discussion is one that could go on for years.    There 
> are indeed many valid uses for the various balun configurations.  And as Rick 
> pointed out, just because one does it, doesn't make it correct. Sometimes 
> companies play "follow the leader" and end up with less than optimum results. 
>  What was in demand for applications 20 years ago may not be the same as the 
> needs today.
> 
> My concluding point, lets keep an open mind, lets learn from others and lets 
> enjoy the hobby.  After all it is a hobby and not a profession.
> 
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Bryce" <prosolar@sssnet.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>