TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:06:34 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 7/11/2013 2:56 PM, Robert Mcgraw wrote:
  Add a complex Xc or Xl plus R load and they aren't matched.
I prefer a 1:1 current balun rated for at least 10 times the expected
power.  They produce less heat and smoke that way.

Let's call a spade a spade. I think we're talking about a common mode choke, right?

The differential mode dissipation of a ferrite common mode choke is negligible. Dissipation is due to common mode voltage and current across the choke, where P = E*I = I sqrd R = Esqrd /R There choking impedance must be high enough to reduce common mode current to a very small value. So that's a DESIGN problem, both the design of the choke and the design of the antenna system (where the feedline and the choke are part of that system).

Example -- we can use a simple bifilar choke wound on a single core like those shown in my RFI tutorial for legal limit to a well-balanced dipole if the feedline is not close to an odd multiple of quarter waves (Vf of the feedline ~ 0.98 because we're talking common mode). Move the feedpoint off center by 20% and the choke will fry, because the common mode voltage is MUCH higher, which increases the common mode current. In this condition, you could use two of those chokes in series to double the choking Z, which would cut the current in half and cut the power in each choke by a factor of 4.

73, Jim K9YC.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>