TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 08:56:03 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The hf rig front panel evolved its knobbed interface over a period of
nearly 100 years.  It works.  I don't need no steenkin'
smartphone/touchscreen/mouse/whatever modern interface for my radio.  Sure,
let the radio hardware be the latest greatest direct digital sampling, but
keep my user interface classical.

73, Barry N1EU

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com> wrote:

> I do agree with Rick to some extent. The days of building from
> scratch are quickly waning away. Yes, it still possible to make
> simple devices, but the degree of complexity of modern items
> outpaces the ability to create.
>
> Consider fiber optic cable -vs- wire. Over the years there's
> been a wide variety of wire of various gauges and materials.
> But still wire was something that you could connect, crimp,
> or solder. Not so with fiber optics - - the diameter is small
> yet it can conduct for miles with very low loss without the
> issues of EMP or moisture. If you want to splice it, you need
> a fusion splicer costing thousands of dollars. If you want to
> connect it, the tools and equipment required to clean, inspect,
> and terminate it place that ability beyond the average technician.
>
> Yes, progress moves on. But that does not mean innovation is
> dead .. it is just different. We still find pleasure in making
> the seemingly impossible work. I speak of homemade antennas that
> defy logic. I speak of emergency power systems that can power
> equipment for days (because of the decreasing power consumption).
>
> Just as LED's have progressed in technology over filament bulbs,
> so has our ability to innovate progressed. We might not be able
> to repair a circuit board full of SMD components. We still, however,
> can take pride in making things work.
>
> Just my thoughts,
>
> 73 de Phil - N8PS
>
>
> -------
>
>
> Quoting Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de>:
>
>  "there is no better time to be a radio UI homebrewer"
>>
>> Oh, I do not agree with that!
>>
>> I agree it is a good thing that people continue to home brew anything at
>> all, but I can't see how the thrill of programming a computer board or
>> radio
>> that they bought can compare with the thrill of hearing that first radio
>> station when I built my first crystal radio in 1958, cat-whisker and all.
>>
>> Or with building a 20m CW transceiver from a schematic and magazine
>> article....
>> Weeks of collecting parts, 40 or 50 hours of soldering it all together,
>> then
>> finally turning it on and hearing radio signals...
>> Then sitting down in the living room with the little rig running off of a
>> battery and using a home brew indoor magnetic loop antenna just 3' in
>> diameter, and working about 20 stations around Europe in a contest, the
>> first 30 minutes on the air.  This was excitement.
>>
>> I built my first computer in 1977, also from an article in a magazine.
>> Gathered the components and soldered it together, just as I had done with
>> radios. And I was proud when it worked.  But that didn't match the thrill
>> of
>> hearing radio stations, at least not for me.
>>
>> I don't want to take anything away from the people participating in the
>> makers movement, but let's not sell the past too short either.  These
>> makers
>> could still build their own radio today if they wanted to.  They have
>> other
>> interests.
>>
>> 73
>> Rick, DJ0IP
>>
>> On 10/31/2014 11:54 PM, Neil Martinsen-Burrell wrote:
>>
>>> it is also true that there is
>>> no better time to be a radio UI homebrewer.  There will be a great
>>> deal of innovation on this front in the next 10 years.  Kudos to
>>> TenTec for giving us the Rebel and allowing innovation to thrive again.
>>>
>>>
>>>  __________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>