Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL

To: <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>, "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL
From: john battin <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:35:42 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
There would be little advantage with the loops because once the side/rear 
response is 20 or so db down,  the RDF is determined by the width of the 
forward lobe. 
John K9DX 

> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:00:13 -0800
> From: r_bakalov@yahoo.com
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL
> 
> I have been wondering if the antenna element in phased arrays could be a loop 
> rather than a vertical. My thinking is that the loop has some level of 
> directivity so phasing two of them should result in better side lobe 
> suppression compared to a vertical. Is there any merit to this thought? 
> Specifically, will I see better RDF numbers if I were to use loop elements in 
> any of the active 8 and 4 circle systems (e.g., DX Engineering, Hi-Z 
> Antennas, etc.)?
> 
> Rudy N2WQ
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
                                          
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>