Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted Vee

To: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted Vee
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:24:41 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> Verticals are much more ground sensitive then dipoles, so it is quit often
> that even the low dipole on a hilltop or in the desert outperforms a
> vertical due to the poor ground.

If your dipole seems good compared to a vertical on 160m, it
is more likely because the vertical is poor than because the
dipole is good.

Rick N6RK
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>