Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Nicopress swags

To: "'Greg'" <ab7r@cablespeed.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Nicopress swags
From: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 22:47:15 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You could contact Karl Tashjian (former Tri-Ex Tower) and have him custom
make whatever you need.
http://www.tashtowers.com/towereng.html


Regards

Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
Sperry, Ok.

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:53 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Nicopress swags

Finally about ready to recable my tower.  Just received the 7x19 galv
aircraft cable, the swag sleevs and thimbles.

My question is ....are the boltcutter type swagging tools just as good as
the hydraulic or electric presses?  I know the tool for the 1/4 sleeves is
pretty much only for that size and there is another tool for the smaller
sizes.  I expected to be able to find a local marine outfit to be able to
crimp the sleeves for me.....but he charges $12-$15 for each sleeve....using
a hydraulic swagger.  Im  tempted to get the 1/4 hand tool myself and use
the one at ACE for the smaller crimps.  Are the crimps with the hand tool
just as strong as the hydraulic?

I would think if the nicopress specs have a part number for the hand tool
for the 1/4 in sleeves that it should be fine.  Im using the zinc plated
cooper sleeves....two for each end.

Tnx
Greg
AB7R

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>