Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR

from [Peter Voelpel] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:51:12 +0200
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> 
Those figures are EZNEC simulated

73
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K7LXC@aol.com

    Currently Force 12 and SteppIR are the only  manufacturers that use our
protocol to produce useful  comparable performance figures.  If Optibeam
figures were produced  similarly, then I'd be more inclined to believe them.

 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TowerTalk] stepir vs c31xr - really Mosle, K7LXC
Next by Date:  Re: [TowerTalk] Plenty of Ham Friends who climb towers, J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR, K7LXC
Next by Thread:  Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR, Jim Lux
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]