Jean Giesler said:
>>I do not see that a change on one WPM would be useful.
and Pete said:
>I share this view.
Both went on to talk about their operating techniques. This was not my intent.
I am sure we all have our things we like and things we don't like. What may be
important to me may not be important to you. More to the point - does anyone
else think TRlog would be improved if this variable were user-definable like so
many other things are (many of which are of little or no value to me
personally)?
The question was "is this easy?" If it is easy I would encourage Tree to do it.
If it is hard I would understand why he would not want to. Of course, the
default should remain 3WPM and the change would be transparent.
I change my sending speed frequently and the technique has served me well. I
would find more resolution in step size useful. Would anyone else?
Mark, N5OT
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|