FAT32 may be adequate for you, but NTFS advantages are not limited to
network environments.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <w7ti@dslextreme.com>
To: <WriteLog@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 03:29
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Converting a disk to NTFS
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:40:57 -0600, rojomn wrote:
>
> >I would not
> >convert myself. NTFS is actually slower, although it is perhaps a bit
less
> >likely to lose data.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> I second the recommendation. I originally installed XP using
> NTFS but later changed back to FAT32. NTFS has some advantages
> for a networked system but for a standalone PC like mine, FAT32
> does everything I need and does it faster.
>
> 73, Bill W7TI
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
|