Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0rc@citlink.net: 420 ]

Total 420 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:45:35 -0600
Before we get too far off track and ramp up the "League bashing"... what's the point if 66% of the officers don't use LOTW? You don't have all the facts. Of those 66%, what percent are on the air? If
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00593.html (10,313 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] LoTW - another view (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:26:56 -0600
Whoa... one is fully functional? Then tell me how I can generate a hardcopy QSL card from LOTW and submit it to a non-ARRL award sponsor. LOTW might be fully functional for you but it is not fully fu
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00622.html (8,809 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] External DSP devices (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:59:59 -0600
Jacob, An external audio DSP unit will help fight some interference, but it is not the right answer to your problem. I have the Timewave DSP unit, but it is a disappointment for serious RTTY contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00683.html (9,128 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Tips for contesting... (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:18:53 -0600
That was (is) very good advice from another seasoned RTTY contester! Let me add to it by saying it can be very intimidating to listen to the wall of RF in the 20m RTTY section during a contest. That
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00700.html (8,101 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] External DSP devices (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:32:49 -0600
Well, there you have it... more sage advice! I'm not sure there's anymore secrets left to share! I agree with Don regarding the Icom IC-756 Pro III... I have one in the box waiting for my new ham sha
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00708.html (10,829 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] AGC: on or off? [long tutorial] (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:22:28 -0600
Peter, That's a good question. And I see several fellows have provided an answer for you. Hopefully I can help by providing an explanation of how this all works. There's a couple of pieces of informa
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00716.html (11,184 bytes)

7. [RTTY] K0RC - 2006 WPX RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:55:13 -0600
CQWPXRTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2006-02-10 CallSign Used : K0RC Operator(s) : K0RC Band : ALL Power : LOW Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : 001 Gridsquare : EN35ni Name : Robert Chudek Addres
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00158.html (7,671 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] W4UK WPX RTTY SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:37:45 -0600
Sure Jerry, Put your name at the bottom of your summary sheet, mail a copy with $1 in each to 10 contesters... 73 de Bob - K0RC _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00191.html (7,017 bytes)

9. [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:57:26 -0600
Tom, Let's see... you mentioned you really missed the AMP twice... and you really liked your '450 once... I would suggest you could do both within your budget... That is, upgrade your FT-840 to anoth
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00291.html (8,638 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:16:06 -0600
Okay, a second shot at this... I agree, the TS-850SAT is definitely a better radio. They're selling in the $700 ~ $800 price range for a sharp used unit. Then you can filter them up for another coupl
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00329.html (9,105 bytes)

11. [RTTY] 2006 NAQP RTTY Spring K0RC Summary... (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:57:07 -0600
NAQPRTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2006-02-25 CallSign Used : K0RC Operator(s) : K0RC Band : ALL Power : LOW Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : BOB MN Gridsquare : EN35ni Name : Robert Chudek Addr
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00365.html (7,458 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:56:15 -0600
Hello Ty, Call me olde fashioned (I just got my AARP card the other week)... but for RTTY contesting, every radio built should have an FSK mode. One diode, one cap, and a piece of wire... pennies...
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00368.html (12,250 bytes)

13. [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on 160Meters) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:11:05 -0600
This thread reminds me about... Around 1998 and 1999 I sponsored a short 4-hour RTTY contest call the High Speed Sprint. I chose to use the rules and scoring from the BARTG contest so no software cha
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00405.html (9,772 bytes)

14. [RTTY] 1999 RTTY HSS Score Summary... (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:28:24 -0600
Hey! that old clunker fired right up... exactly where I left it, under the tire in the backyard... :-) I found an old WF1B reflector archive on my machine. Here's the 1999 RTTY HSS Scores sheet compi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00406.html (9,821 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on160Meters) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:47:15 -0600
Okay I see my memory is failing me again (my mother told me it would only get worse)... The High Speed Sprint was run and scored using the SARTG rules, not BARTG as I previously stated. The SARTG rul
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00413.html (8,216 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:56:51 -0600
Okay, that's twice in one evening... C.R.S. "P.S. ....Also, a bug was revealed in the WF1B software at the higher speed. Ray had to fix something, I don't remember the particulars....." The bug that
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00414.html (7,056 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] [Kenwood] Changing a lightbulb (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:03:07 -0600
Lightbulbs? LIGHTBULBS?? We don't need no stinkin' lightbulbs! * * * * * * * * * * * Message: 7 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:48:19 -0500 From: "Eric - VE3GSI" <ve3gsi@sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00415.html (7,863 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:33:02 -0600
Ty, you're probably right regarding running out of stations to work if it's limited to 160 meters. But I really like the idea of making it an exclusive 160-meter event. It keeps the participants from
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00425.html (12,918 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:14:08 -0600
After sleeping on my 5-day event idea, I agree that it sucks... So I've scratched that... On the other hand, I think two hours is a little too short... If the contest was for 4 hours, you can get som
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00002.html (8,850 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:39:34 -0600
Yup, it's just you Bill... :-) I do believe Ty is correct that we would run out of RTTY stations to work on 160 meters pretty fast. I would go watch paint dry instead of sit in front of the radio wit
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00011.html (9,088 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu