Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+daf\s+amplifier\s+circuit\,\s+on\s+air\s+testing\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+daf\s+amplifier\s+circuit\,\s+on\s+air\s+testing\.\.\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Mike Michon); Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:48:27 -0800; This reminds me of the daf amplifier debate. Mike AB5XP Alan Watts: There are basically two kinds of philosophy. One's called prickles, the other's called goo. And prickly people are precise, rigorou; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00000.html (9,964 bytes)
2. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 04:51:16 -0700; ? As I understand it, Norm started off with the G2DAF article and circuit. When the distortion proved to be problematic, Norm began experimenting with the screen circuitry in hopes of reducing disto; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00004.html (7,991 bytes)
3. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (nospam4me@juno.com); Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 23:50:06 -0800; Hello Peter, From: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com> This wise guy contested the signal I heard on 40 meters an adequate distance away, where I shouldn't have heard him. The typical round table with; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00411.html (11,732 bytes)
4. SV: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: harlins@swipnet.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:12:42 +0100; -Snip As Colin, K7FM correctly states; There is one *important* difference. The time constant in Norm´s screen circuit was way to slow !! It most certainly would! Now, if your only reference is; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00412.html (10,778 bytes)
5. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 13:37:27 +0100; I love it Skipp (Bush ??)! I note with interest what you say, the only thing I can say is that if Norm's amp is to be considered the standard of all DAF amps you are wrong. I can immidately point out; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00414.html (9,767 bytes)
6. SV: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 05:02:09 -0700; ? Norm tried various time constant screen supply configurations. The one that produced acceptable distortion was a 350v shunt regulator. The 3/2 power rule is undoubtedly true. ? There were two DAF; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00415.html (11,720 bytes)
7. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 05:10:08 -0700; I have never heard a G-G amplifier that had -22db total distortion. Hal's 2, 813 - DAF amp produced similar results. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00416.html (9,041 bytes)
8. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 05:10:05 -0700; Skipp. Your attribution is bogus. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amp; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00417.html (13,410 bytes)
9. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 08:42:58 -0500; Welp, here is my whole take on this DAF thing: It appears that this circuit would use far less materials to construct (i.e. lack of a screen supply). If it was even close to a great design, companies; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00418.html (9,060 bytes)
10. SV: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: harlins@swipnet.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 16:23:37 +0100; -- Ursprungligt meddelande -- Från: Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net> Till: <amps@contesting.com>; <nospam4me@juno.com> Skickat: den 31 december 1999 14:42 Ämne: Re: [AMPS] daf amplifier ci; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00420.html (9,181 bytes)
11. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 08:06:03 -0700; ? The screen supply for the 2, 4CX250B amp in question required a string of a dozen 30v, 5w zeners tied to the cold end of the extant HV bleeder resistor. Total cost, under $10. cheers, Mike. - Rich; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00421.html (8,862 bytes)
12. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:58:18 -0500; Nicely done, Mike. On behalf of everyone, (who cares), Thank you!. Happy Y2K, Mike(y) W3SLK people To: <amps@contesting.com> ;-o)) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: a; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00423.html (12,381 bytes)
13. [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing... (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:05:38 +0000; One more time... there has only ever been *ONE* G2DAF circuit. Only one was ever published, and a scanned copy is on my web site. All the others - including Norm's circuits - are NOT G2DAF amps. They; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00447.html (8,986 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]