Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+\-\-\s+revised\s+opinion\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:55:15 -0500
In an earlier incarnation of the "SO2R should be a separate clas from 'real' single op" discussion, I voted "no." I felt that if you had the hardware and the skill to jump to the second radio to grab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00380.html (8,501 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:44:45 -0800
Hi, Art. I think you were right the first time. If you develop the skill, it can help and be reasonably non-intrusive. It's a genuine single-op skill and should not put you in a different category. M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00383.html (11,639 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:42:00 -0500
It all depends on how SO2R is done, in my opinion. First, let's clear something up - "dueling CQs" have been a reality in situations like SS Sundays for at least a decade, maybe longer. Like many SO2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00387.html (10,582 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:59:00 -0600
Hello Art, I sympathize, but like many practices we accept, I don't think that because some people aren't yet adept at SO2R is a reason to punish those who are. It's still a legitimate skill worthy o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00390.html (9,768 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:27:47 -00
Kelly got it exactly right! See here --> http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html for another persuasive argument in support. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00392.html (8,609 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:28:56 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't think anyone wants to "punish" the SO2R station. I admire the guys who go to the max to increase their scores. My only objection is lumping S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00397.html (9,399 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:29:13 -0500
N4ZR: situations like SS Sundays for at least a decade, maybe longer. More like >3 decades...when C-lines were popular. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00398.html (7,979 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Collins N8VW" <n8vw@linuxcolumbus.com>
Date: 11 Nov 2005 12:55:17 -0500
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:55:15 -0500, "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net> wrote : logging program. Well! My slow little bulb began its feeble glow. Alternating CQs on two bands or two freq's. People
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00399.html (8,449 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:53:12 -0600
Good question Pat. I think the obvious answer is that we're talking about a single operator. Some persist in not understanding this distinction. Even so, I think this deserves some thought, and discu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00402.html (8,057 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:57:02 -0600
" Yes, computerization has made SO2R more easier and more efficient but the techniques have been in use for at least 30 years. " No argument. The question I think that needs to be asked is: Should th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00404.html (9,064 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:11:52 -0600
The difference is thus: The 10-minute rule was, rightly or wrongly, to prevent stations from behaving like M/M but entering as M/S, where an M/M-like operation would have a clear advantage. By defini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00405.html (11,370 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:18:59 -0600
Hi Bob, I think the duelling CQ's argument is a bit of a red herring: even the best ops say duelling CQs is only possible when the activity is light enough. If activity is light, then it shouldn't ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00406.html (9,831 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:20:00 -0600
Bill, we've disagreed on this before, but if the best operators say the advantage is maybe 95 QSOs out of 1200, is it that huge? 73, kelly ve4xt -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00407.html (11,266 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:24:46 -0600
because It is not a matter of punishment it is a matter of information, accuracy and learning. It depends which pack you want to be compared to. When I am SO1R I want to be compared to other SO1R co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00408.html (9,599 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:09:06 -00
Contesting -- really competitive contesting -- is all about trying to develop skills that will be difficult for the other players to duplicate, thus tilting the playing field in your favor. SO2R is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00410.html (9,568 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Tessmer <Mike.Tessmer@hillmangroup.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:07:49 -0500
1980: It is widely known and accepted that most of the Top 10 (and more)in SS use two radios in one scheme or another. There are no calls for separate categories. 2005: It is widely known and accepte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00411.html (8,832 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:22:50 -0800
operator to rise above the pack if he's able to do it. I think the problem is not with those who are adept at running SO2R. I think the issues I have are with people who are not. Let's face it--it's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00413.html (10,851 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:35:23 -0500
operators say the huge? In Sweepstakes, absolutely. Especially when everybody has 80 mults. Not that I disagree with SO2R, but I do disagree with your point. 73 Rich NN3W ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00416.html (8,832 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:41:32 -0600
The point lost due to my desire to be brief was this: we will never know how many of those 95 Qs they would have worked anyway. If they would have worked all 95 regardless, net gain is zero. So even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00418.html (9,508 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:46:30 -0000
There is no "single-operator unassisted" category. What we have is "single-operator" and "single-operator assisted". The difference between these two is that, in the assisted category, the operator r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00419.html (9,651 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu