Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SOxR\s+\-\-\s+enough\s+already\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:06:41 -0800 (PST)
"At the largest station in the region, automated and ready for battle I scratch my head realizing there is no separate category to compete SO1R. The hope is that someday soon the results will display
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00580.html (8,078 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:30:08 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- No, we don't. Nobody is calling for all those categories. Just as adding an amplifier gives a great advantage, adding a second radio gives a great advantage. Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00609.html (8,188 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Well, why not? Why aren't we calling for those categories for M/S? There is no reason to segregate one category that is ostensibly "single transmitter" using two rigs as a single op when the exact sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00614.html (10,487 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- Enough Already (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Plumblee" <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:07:56 -0500
--Quoting W6WRT-- A station with only one radio can not compete against one with two. Other factors being equal, they will lose every time, just as an LP station will lose to an HP station every time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00620.html (8,463 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Fields" <gwfields@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:55:13 -0600
Adding a second radio isn't like turning on an amplifier. Heck, anyone can go out and buy and amp and run it in a contest. It's easy. Hook it up, turn it on, and go! Adding a second radio doesn't ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00626.html (9,516 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:46:55 -0500
It's never going to be "fair", but it's always going to be fun - at least for me. If it was made to be fair - "level the playing field" even I might be able to win something, get a plaque or a certif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00628.html (8,220 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:50:42 -0800
Huh?? I run 2 radios here and made 280 Q's in the CQWW CW test. I'm sure that there are a few op's using 1 radio that could beat that :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00629.html (7,755 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:45:52 -0500
I think you finally hit the nail on the head!? Being good at SO2R means you have spent a LOT of time with your radio(s) getting to that point - something that a "single radio contester just getting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00632.html (8,912 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:43:13 +0200
my 2 cents into this funny everlasting discussion. It does not matter how big advantage SO2R gives ot how hard it is do it. Of course it gives you advantage and of course it requires some skill do it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00636.html (12,290 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: "Trent and Lorraine Sampson" <vk4ti@sampson.net.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:18:06 +1000
The technology is available to operate S02R, if the op is good enough he can gain advantages, if not he won't. D4B was a great exponent of SO2R, Vk4TI is too busy drinking beer from the fridge to wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00639.html (10,759 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:17:31 -0600
The potential advantage of SO2R is more efficient use of time, accomplished by listening while transmitting. This technique was explained in detail almost 14 years ago by K1ZM in the National Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00659.html (11,540 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu