Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s*$/: 68 ]

Total 68 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: n6oj at sbcglobal.net (Chuck); Date: Fri Jan 24 14:08:23 2003; Hi Guys There is no way to inforce the one radio on at a time so lets have single operator as one class and single op multi radio another class Problem solved (MAYBE) There is no way to eliminating c; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00323.html (6,312 bytes)
2. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: jlockj at earthlink.net (John); Date: Fri Jan 24 21:30:11 2003; I agree Mike - the contest committees should get rid of those pesky high power/low power distinctions too! At least while I own a 8877 amp. ; ) 73, John W0DC knowledge,; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00335.html (8,317 bytes)
3. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: wx4tm at direcway.com (Tom Moore); Date: Fri Jan 24 22:51:42 2003; I don't think anyone has remotely suggested or implied that anyone cheats. Your comment could be applied to any rule. You're very right, there's no way to check (for the most part). But thats no reas; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00337.html (7,409 bytes)
4. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: n6oj@sbcglobal.net (Chuck); Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:38:25 -0700; Hi All; I have been wondering what the ruling is when you are running two transmitters and 2 computers each station giving out its own number , the numbers then would not be consecutive in the log an; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00197.html (6,767 bytes)
5. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:57:53 -0500; the contact Huh? If you're talking about Single Op, then why would each station work the same station on the same band? That would be a DUPE. Are the 2 stations using a networked contest logging pro; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00198.html (7,100 bytes)
6. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 23:15:52 -0500; It's an interesting question but my thoughts are that in contests that require consecutive serial numbers in the exchange, that consecutive serial numbers be given. Since we are talking about Single; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00200.html (9,276 bytes)
7. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: N6OJ <n6oj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:55:43 -0700; Hi Gang Along with the comments about sportsmanship I heard a couple of stations running SO2R and both the transmitters were transmitting at the same time ((Maybe they will enter multi transmitter (Y; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00125.html (6,348 bytes)
8. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:42:09 -0400; Since my name was brought into this, I'd thought I'd make a comment. I'm not sure where I came up with this 40% figure but I think Bill is accurate in that I did a study of my logs before and after; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00209.html (8,179 bytes)
9. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:42:17 -0500; Comments inline, below. Message: 8 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:42:09 -0400 From: <aa5au@bellsouth.net> Subject: [RTTY] SO2R To: <rtty@contesting.com> Message-ID: <20060721214209.DTUT1324.ibm63aec.bells; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00221.html (9,783 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:14:20 -0400; Each operator picks those tools, techniques and equipment that best fit his situation. One may use SO2R to make up for a less than killer antenna farm ... another may choose big antennas over power .; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00222.html (8,131 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:25:40 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- A meaningless comparison. One can golf every day if he wants, but how does one contest every day? Nice try, though. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00226.html (7,667 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:57:25 -0400; One can contest every weekend ... and practice with tapes or one of the contest simulators every day. There are even "practices' on Thursday nights many weeks. That still doesn't address the thousand; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00228.html (7,550 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:17:01 -0500; Joe, I agree with you, everything else is not always equal. My point is a second radio adds a significant (measurable) advantage to radiosport - in itself. Here's what I mean... What killer antenna s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00231.html (10,795 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:49:20 -0400; Bob, We have a basic disagreement on the level of benefit from the second radio. AA5AU's experience is probably right in that SO2R might provide a 40% benefit if one has a compromised antenna system; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00233.html (9,863 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:13:22 -0500; K0RC - Yes we're zeroing in on it! (level of benefit) This is why I was questioning what configuration the top 20 NAQP RTTY stations were using. I compared the only example I personally had experienc; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00234.html (13,066 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:25:06 -0400; I don't think you can base a judgment on a "sample of one" - particularly a pair of stations that may or may not otherwise be matched and without controlling for other variables. If you grind away f; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00235.html (12,685 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:12:30 -0500; K0RC - True, a sample of one is not adequate. K0RC - It's not a matter of Run vs. S&P strategy. It's a matter of time available to find more stations. Let's say your transmitter is "on" 25% of the ti; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00240.html (12,117 bytes)
18. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Ian McCloy" <va7sw@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:47:28 -0700; Must be contest time this idea pops up near every major contest the rules exists i can not do it But those who can all be it Rtty is fun and contesting is great Lets find a subject that is useful to; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00125.html (6,165 bytes)
19. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Ian McCloy" <va7sw@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:32:32 -0700; I am tired of what I consider is becoming Spam Email Lets all be gentlemen and DROP THIS SUBJECT If you do not like SO2R which I am not in that category then do your best with what you have. Ham Radi; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00258.html (6,650 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:16:59 -0700; Ok Joe.... Then is 2OSR not the same as single operator? No, their multi operator. No matter how many ops they have, their simply multi operator. (Not talking about multi 2 or multi multi) So Joe...; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00319.html (9,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]