Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED
From: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:10:05 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

R L Measures wrote:
> 
> On May 30, 2006, at 11:07 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> R L Measures wrote:
>>
>>> Just how the AL-1500's designer came to the conclusion that 5000-ohms
>>> of feedback XC at the tube's max freq rating could not cause
>>> oscillation is a mystery.
>>
>>
>> Maybe he didn't. Feedback C is but one of many factors contributing to
>> oscillation, and one over which the designer has no influence. Perhaps
>> he believed/designed/intended that other elements of the circuit
>> prevented gain>1 and phase=0 without the need for an anode auppressor.
> 
> 
> It must have have been a wishful intention, Steve, since there is  
> nothing unique about the 8877 -- in fact, its extraordinary gain- 
> bandwidth product should have been a pretty good clue that  oscillation 
> was something it could probably do.
Indeed - but anode suppressors are not the only way to prevent oscillation.

Steve
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>